Unchained vs Nunchuk — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Unchained and Nunchuk across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Unchained scores 7.1 vs Nunchuk's 5.9. Unchained leads in 6 of 8 categories.
Unchained is better suited for HNW individuals, Families, Small institutions. Nunchuk is better suited for Families, Teams, Multi-sig users.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Unchained | Nunchuk | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 8.5 | 8.0 | Unchained |
| Insurance | 15% | 4.0 | 2.0 | Unchained |
| Regulatory | 15% | 5.0 | 3.0 | Unchained |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 9.5 | 9.0 | Unchained |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.5 | 6.5 | Unchained |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 9.5 | 9.5 | Tie |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 6.0 | 4.0 | Unchained |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 6.0 | 7.0 | Nunchuk |
| Overall Score | 100% | 7.1 | 5.9 | Unchained |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Unchained and Nunchuk across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (8.5 vs 8.0)
Unchained uses 2-of-3 collaborative multisig key management with 100% (hardware wallets) in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A (client-controlled keys). Incident history: No incidents.
Nunchuk uses Collaborative multisig wallet key management with 100% (hardware wallets) in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No incidents.
Insurance (4.0 vs 2.0)
Unchained offers Limited — Unchained's key is insured but client keys are client's responsibility via Not publicly disclosed. Because client holds majority of keys, insurance model is different from full-custodian solutions. Client bears primary responsibility for key security.
Nunchuk offers Limited — collaborative custody model via N/A. Users hold their own keys. Nunchuk assists but doesn't insure.
Regulatory (5.0 vs 3.0)
Unchained holds FinCEN MSB registration and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States. Not a qualified custodian in the SEC sense — by design, since the client holds majority of keys. This is a feature, not a bug, for self-sovereignty advocates.
Nunchuk holds N/A and is not a qualified custodian operating in Canada. Canadian company. Not a custodian — provides wallet software.
Fee Transparency (9.5 vs 9.0)
Unchained charges $250/year (Standard) / $1,200/year (Premium) in annual custody fees with No transaction fees for self-managed per transaction. Also offers Bitcoin-backed loans. IRA custody available at additional cost.
Nunchuk charges See setup (subscription model) in annual custody fees with No transaction fees per transaction. Premium includes server-assisted keys and inheritance planning.
Track Record (8.5 vs 6.5)
Unchained was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $2B+ in Bitcoin secured. Incident history: No incidents.
Nunchuk was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. AUM: Not publicly disclosed. Incident history: No incidents.
Withdrawal Flexibility (9.5 vs 9.5)
Unchained withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: No minimum for basic vault. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Nunchuk withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Reporting & Audit (6.0 vs 4.0)
Unchained: SOC compliance is N/A (client-controlled keys). Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Nunchuk: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (6.0 vs 7.0)
Unchained is a collaborative custody provider. Key management: 2-of-3 multisig. Client holds 2 keys (hardware wallets), Unchained holds 1 key. Client can always transact independently..
Nunchuk is a collaborative custody provider. Key management: Collaborative multisig. Flexible key configurations (2-of-3, 3-of-5, etc.)..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Unchained and Nunchuk.
| Fee Type | Unchained | Nunchuk |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Free (basic) / $250 (concierge onboarding) | Free (basic) / $14.99/month (Premium) / Custom (Business) |
| Annual Custody | $250/year (Standard) / $1,200/year (Premium) | See setup (subscription model) |
| Transaction | No transaction fees for self-managed | No transaction fees |
| Withdrawal | Network fees only | Network fees only |
Unchained: Also offers Bitcoin-backed loans. IRA custody available at additional cost.
Nunchuk: Premium includes server-assisted keys and inheritance planning.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Unchained | Nunchuk |
|---|---|---|
| 2-of-3 multisig vaults | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin-backed loans | ✓ | ✗ |
| Client holds majority of keys | ✓ | ✗ |
| Collaborative multisig | ✗ | ✓ |
| Concierge onboarding with Bitcoin expert | ✓ | ✗ |
| Flexible key configurations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Hardware wallet integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| IRA accounts | ✓ | ✗ |
| Inheritance planning | ✗ | ✓ |
| Inheritance planning (Unchained can assist beneficiaries) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Key replacement assistance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Taproot support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team-based key management | ✗ | ✓ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Unchained is better if you…
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a families
- ✓Are a small institutions
- ✓Are a self-sovereignty advocates
- ✓Want: Client always maintains control — can move funds without Unchained
- ✓Want: Excellent for inheritance planning
- ✓Want: Very transparent, affordable pricing ($250-1,200/year)
Nunchuk is better if you…
- ✓Are a families
- ✓Are a teams
- ✓Are a multi-sig users
- ✓Are a inheritance planners
- ✓Want: Excellent multisig UX — genuinely easy
- ✓Want: Flexible key configurations
- ✓Want: Inheritance planning built-in
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Unchained or Nunchuk better for Bitcoin custody?
Unchained scores 7.1 vs 5.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Unchained leads in 6 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Unchained is best for HNW individuals and Families, while Nunchuk suits Families and Teams.
What is the difference between Unchained and Nunchuk?
Unchained is a collaborative custody provider, while Nunchuk is a collaborative custody provider. Unchained excels in Fee Transparency, whereas Nunchuk is strongest in Withdrawal Flexibility.
How do Unchained and Nunchuk fees compare?
Unchained charges $250/year (Standard) / $1,200/year (Premium) annual custody fees with No transaction fees for self-managed transaction fees. Nunchuk charges See setup (subscription model) annual custody fees with No transaction fees transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Unchained or Nunchuk?
Unchained scores 8.5/10 for security while Nunchuk scores 8.0/10. Unchained uses 2-of-3 collaborative multisig key management, and Nunchuk uses Collaborative multisig wallet.
Related
Explore More
Unchained Full Review
Deep dive into Unchained's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Nunchuk Full Review
Deep dive into Nunchuk's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison