Unchained vs Nunchuk — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison

An independent, data-driven comparison of Unchained and Nunchuk across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.

Quick Verdict

Unchained scores 7.1 vs Nunchuk's 5.9. Unchained leads in 6 of 8 categories.

Unchained is better suited for HNW individuals, Families, Small institutions. Nunchuk is better suited for Families, Teams, Multi-sig users.

7.1
GoodCustody Score
Unchained
vs
5.9
Below AverageCustody Score
Nunchuk

Score Comparison

Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.

CriterionWeightUnchainedNunchukWinner
Security20%8.58.0Unchained
Insurance15%4.02.0Unchained
Regulatory15%5.03.0Unchained
Fee Transparency10%9.59.0Unchained
Track Record15%8.56.5Unchained
Withdrawal Flexibility10%9.59.5Tie
Reporting & Audit10%6.04.0Unchained
Counterparty Diversification5%6.07.0Nunchuk
Overall Score100%
7.1
5.9
Unchained

Score Radar

Visual overlay of Unchained and Nunchuk across all categories.

SecurityInsuranceRegulatoryFeesTrack RecordWithdrawalsReportingDiversification
UnchainedNunchuk

Category-by-Category Analysis

A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.

Security (8.5 vs 8.0)

Unchained uses 2-of-3 collaborative multisig key management with 100% (hardware wallets) in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A (client-controlled keys). Incident history: No incidents.

Nunchuk uses Collaborative multisig wallet key management with 100% (hardware wallets) in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No incidents.

Insurance (4.0 vs 2.0)

Unchained offers Limited — Unchained's key is insured but client keys are client's responsibility via Not publicly disclosed. Because client holds majority of keys, insurance model is different from full-custodian solutions. Client bears primary responsibility for key security.

Nunchuk offers Limited — collaborative custody model via N/A. Users hold their own keys. Nunchuk assists but doesn't insure.

Regulatory (5.0 vs 3.0)

Unchained holds FinCEN MSB registration and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States. Not a qualified custodian in the SEC sense — by design, since the client holds majority of keys. This is a feature, not a bug, for self-sovereignty advocates.

Nunchuk holds N/A and is not a qualified custodian operating in Canada. Canadian company. Not a custodian — provides wallet software.

Fee Transparency (9.5 vs 9.0)

Unchained charges $250/year (Standard) / $1,200/year (Premium) in annual custody fees with No transaction fees for self-managed per transaction. Also offers Bitcoin-backed loans. IRA custody available at additional cost.

Nunchuk charges See setup (subscription model) in annual custody fees with No transaction fees per transaction. Premium includes server-assisted keys and inheritance planning.

Track Record (8.5 vs 6.5)

Unchained was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $2B+ in Bitcoin secured. Incident history: No incidents.

Nunchuk was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. AUM: Not publicly disclosed. Incident history: No incidents.

Withdrawal Flexibility (9.5 vs 9.5)

Unchained withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: No minimum for basic vault. Supported assets: Bitcoin.

Nunchuk withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin.

Reporting & Audit (6.0 vs 4.0)

Unchained: SOC compliance is N/A (client-controlled keys). Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Nunchuk: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Counterparty Diversification (6.0 vs 7.0)

Unchained is a collaborative custody provider. Key management: 2-of-3 multisig. Client holds 2 keys (hardware wallets), Unchained holds 1 key. Client can always transact independently..

Nunchuk is a collaborative custody provider. Key management: Collaborative multisig. Flexible key configurations (2-of-3, 3-of-5, etc.)..

Fee Comparison

Side-by-side fee breakdown for Unchained and Nunchuk.

Fee TypeUnchainedNunchuk
Setup FeeFree (basic) / $250 (concierge onboarding)Free (basic) / $14.99/month (Premium) / Custom (Business)
Annual Custody$250/year (Standard) / $1,200/year (Premium)See setup (subscription model)
TransactionNo transaction fees for self-managedNo transaction fees
WithdrawalNetwork fees onlyNetwork fees only

Unchained: Also offers Bitcoin-backed loans. IRA custody available at additional cost.

Nunchuk: Premium includes server-assisted keys and inheritance planning.

Feature Comparison

Checklist of features across both providers.

FeatureUnchainedNunchuk
2-of-3 multisig vaults
Bitcoin-backed loans
Client holds majority of keys
Collaborative multisig
Concierge onboarding with Bitcoin expert
Flexible key configurations
Hardware wallet integration
IRA accounts
Inheritance planning
Inheritance planning (Unchained can assist beneficiaries)
Key replacement assistance
Taproot support
Team-based key management

Who Should Choose Which?

Unchained is better if you…

  • Are a hnw individuals
  • Are a families
  • Are a small institutions
  • Are a self-sovereignty advocates
  • Want: Client always maintains control — can move funds without Unchained
  • Want: Excellent for inheritance planning
  • Want: Very transparent, affordable pricing ($250-1,200/year)

Nunchuk is better if you…

  • Are a families
  • Are a teams
  • Are a multi-sig users
  • Are a inheritance planners
  • Want: Excellent multisig UX — genuinely easy
  • Want: Flexible key configurations
  • Want: Inheritance planning built-in

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Unchained or Nunchuk better for Bitcoin custody?

Unchained scores 7.1 vs 5.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Unchained leads in 6 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Unchained is best for HNW individuals and Families, while Nunchuk suits Families and Teams.

What is the difference between Unchained and Nunchuk?

Unchained is a collaborative custody provider, while Nunchuk is a collaborative custody provider. Unchained excels in Fee Transparency, whereas Nunchuk is strongest in Withdrawal Flexibility.

How do Unchained and Nunchuk fees compare?

Unchained charges $250/year (Standard) / $1,200/year (Premium) annual custody fees with No transaction fees for self-managed transaction fees. Nunchuk charges See setup (subscription model) annual custody fees with No transaction fees transaction fees.

Which is more secure, Unchained or Nunchuk?

Unchained scores 8.5/10 for security while Nunchuk scores 8.0/10. Unchained uses 2-of-3 collaborative multisig key management, and Nunchuk uses Collaborative multisig wallet.