Onramp vs Robinhood — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Onramp and Robinhood across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Onramp scores 8.7 vs Robinhood's 6.9. Onramp leads in 7 of 8 categories.
Onramp is better suited for Family offices, RIAs, HNW individuals. Robinhood is better suited for Stock traders adding crypto, Fee-conscious traders, Beginners.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Onramp | Robinhood | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.5 | 7.0 | Onramp |
| Insurance | 15% | 9.0 | 6.0 | Onramp |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.5 | 8.5 | Tie |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.5 | 6.0 | Onramp |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.0 | 7.0 | Onramp |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 7.5 | Onramp |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.5 | 8.0 | Onramp |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 10.0 | 2.0 | Onramp |
| Overall Score | 100% | 8.7 | 6.9 | Onramp |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Onramp and Robinhood across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.5 vs 7.0)
Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management with Varies by underlying custodian in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). Incident history: No incidents.
Robinhood uses Exchange-managed custody key management with Majority cold in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: 2021 data breach (customer info, not funds). Crypto wallets added later..
Insurance (9.0 vs 6.0)
Onramp offers Aggregate coverage across multiple custodian insurance policies via Multiple (via underlying custodians). Each underlying custodian maintains their own insurance. Combined coverage exceeds single-custodian limits.
Robinhood offers SIPC for securities (NOT crypto). Crime insurance for crypto. via SIPC (securities) + crime insurance. SIPC coverage for stocks. Crypto has separate crime insurance.
Regulatory (8.5 vs 8.5)
Onramp holds State money transmitter licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Regulated through underlying custodian partnerships with qualified custodians
Robinhood holds NASDAQ listed (HOOD), SEC/FINRA registered (securities), State money transmitter licenses (crypto) and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Publicly traded. SEC registered for securities. State-licensed for crypto.
Fee Transparency (7.5 vs 6.0)
Onramp charges Contact for pricing in annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) per transaction. Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Robinhood charges None in annual custody fees with 0% commission (spread-based ~0.4%) per transaction. Commission-free trading. Revenue from spread and payment for order flow.
Track Record (8.0 vs 7.0)
Onramp was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $1B+. Incident history: No incidents.
Robinhood was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Menlo Park, CA. AUM: $130B+ in assets under custody (all assets). Incident history: 2021 data breach (customer info, not funds). Crypto wallets added later..
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 7.5)
Onramp withdrawal fees: Contact for pricing. Minimum account: $100,000. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Robinhood withdrawal fees: Network fees. Minimum account: $1 minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 20+ cryptocurrencies.
Reporting & Audit (8.5 vs 8.0)
Onramp: SOC compliance is Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Robinhood: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Counterparty Diversification (10.0 vs 2.0)
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider. Key management: Multi-institution distributed custody — keys and assets spread across multiple independent regulated custodians (BitGo, Coinbase, Fidelity, etc.).
Robinhood is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed custody with option to withdraw crypto to external wallets..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Onramp and Robinhood.
| Fee Type | Onramp | Robinhood |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Contact for pricing | Free |
| Annual Custody | Contact for pricing | None |
| Transaction | 0.50% per trade (brokerage) | 0% commission (spread-based ~0.4%) |
| Withdrawal | Contact for pricing | Network fees |
Onramp: Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Robinhood: Commission-free trading. Revenue from spread and payment for order flow.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Onramp | Robinhood |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5% cashback card | ✓ | ✗ |
| 23M+ funded accounts | ✗ | ✓ |
| 5% APY on cash balances | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin brokerage services (Onramp Finance) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitstamp acquisition | ✗ | ✓ |
| Clean mobile interface | ✗ | ✓ |
| Commission-free trading | ✗ | ✓ |
| Crypto alongside stocks | ✗ | ✓ |
| Crypto wallets with withdrawals | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade security and compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi-Institution Custody across multiple regulated custodians | ✓ | ✗ |
| No single point of failure | ✓ | ✗ |
| White-glove onboarding for institutions | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Onramp is better if you…
- ✓Are a family offices
- ✓Are a rias
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a institutions
- ✓Want: Only provider offering true multi-institution custody — no single point of failure
- ✓Want: Aggregated insurance coverage exceeds any single custodian
- ✓Want: $1B+ in assets under custody demonstrates institutional trust
Robinhood is better if you…
- ✓Are a stock traders adding crypto
- ✓Are a fee-conscious traders
- ✓Are a beginners
- ✓Are a us retail investors
- ✓Want: Commission-free crypto trading
- ✓Want: Crypto alongside stock portfolio
- ✓Want: Publicly traded — transparent
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Onramp or Robinhood better for Bitcoin custody?
Onramp scores 8.7 vs 6.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Onramp leads in 7 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Onramp is best for Family offices and RIAs, while Robinhood suits Stock traders adding crypto and Fee-conscious traders.
What is the difference between Onramp and Robinhood?
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider, while Robinhood is a exchange custody provider. Onramp excels in Counterparty Diversification, whereas Robinhood is strongest in Regulatory.
How do Onramp and Robinhood fees compare?
Onramp charges Contact for pricing annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) transaction fees. Robinhood charges None annual custody fees with 0% commission (spread-based ~0.4%) transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Onramp or Robinhood?
Onramp scores 9.5/10 for security while Robinhood scores 7.0/10. Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management, and Robinhood uses Exchange-managed custody.
Related
Explore More
Onramp Full Review
Deep dive into Onramp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Robinhood Full Review
Deep dive into Robinhood's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison