Onramp vs Nunchuk — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Onramp and Nunchuk across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Onramp scores 8.7 vs Nunchuk's 5.9. Onramp leads in 6 of 8 categories.
Onramp is better suited for Family offices, RIAs, HNW individuals. Nunchuk is better suited for Families, Teams, Multi-sig users.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Onramp | Nunchuk | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.5 | 8.0 | Onramp |
| Insurance | 15% | 9.0 | 2.0 | Onramp |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.5 | 3.0 | Onramp |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.5 | 9.0 | Nunchuk |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.0 | 6.5 | Onramp |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 9.5 | Nunchuk |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.5 | 4.0 | Onramp |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 10.0 | 7.0 | Onramp |
| Overall Score | 100% | 8.7 | 5.9 | Onramp |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Onramp and Nunchuk across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.5 vs 8.0)
Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management with Varies by underlying custodian in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). Incident history: No incidents.
Nunchuk uses Collaborative multisig wallet key management with 100% (hardware wallets) in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No incidents.
Insurance (9.0 vs 2.0)
Onramp offers Aggregate coverage across multiple custodian insurance policies via Multiple (via underlying custodians). Each underlying custodian maintains their own insurance. Combined coverage exceeds single-custodian limits.
Nunchuk offers Limited — collaborative custody model via N/A. Users hold their own keys. Nunchuk assists but doesn't insure.
Regulatory (8.5 vs 3.0)
Onramp holds State money transmitter licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Regulated through underlying custodian partnerships with qualified custodians
Nunchuk holds N/A and is not a qualified custodian operating in Canada. Canadian company. Not a custodian — provides wallet software.
Fee Transparency (7.5 vs 9.0)
Onramp charges Contact for pricing in annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) per transaction. Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Nunchuk charges See setup (subscription model) in annual custody fees with No transaction fees per transaction. Premium includes server-assisted keys and inheritance planning.
Track Record (8.0 vs 6.5)
Onramp was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $1B+. Incident history: No incidents.
Nunchuk was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. AUM: Not publicly disclosed. Incident history: No incidents.
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 9.5)
Onramp withdrawal fees: Contact for pricing. Minimum account: $100,000. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Nunchuk withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Reporting & Audit (8.5 vs 4.0)
Onramp: SOC compliance is Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Nunchuk: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (10.0 vs 7.0)
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider. Key management: Multi-institution distributed custody — keys and assets spread across multiple independent regulated custodians (BitGo, Coinbase, Fidelity, etc.).
Nunchuk is a collaborative custody provider. Key management: Collaborative multisig. Flexible key configurations (2-of-3, 3-of-5, etc.)..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Onramp and Nunchuk.
| Fee Type | Onramp | Nunchuk |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Contact for pricing | Free (basic) / $14.99/month (Premium) / Custom (Business) |
| Annual Custody | Contact for pricing | See setup (subscription model) |
| Transaction | 0.50% per trade (brokerage) | No transaction fees |
| Withdrawal | Contact for pricing | Network fees only |
Onramp: Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Nunchuk: Premium includes server-assisted keys and inheritance planning.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Onramp | Nunchuk |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5% cashback card | ✓ | ✗ |
| 5% APY on cash balances | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin brokerage services (Onramp Finance) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Collaborative multisig | ✗ | ✓ |
| Flexible key configurations | ✗ | ✓ |
| Hardware wallet integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Inheritance planning | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade security and compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi-Institution Custody across multiple regulated custodians | ✓ | ✗ |
| No single point of failure | ✓ | ✗ |
| Taproot support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Team-based key management | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-glove onboarding for institutions | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Onramp is better if you…
- ✓Are a family offices
- ✓Are a rias
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a institutions
- ✓Want: Only provider offering true multi-institution custody — no single point of failure
- ✓Want: Aggregated insurance coverage exceeds any single custodian
- ✓Want: $1B+ in assets under custody demonstrates institutional trust
Nunchuk is better if you…
- ✓Are a families
- ✓Are a teams
- ✓Are a multi-sig users
- ✓Are a inheritance planners
- ✓Want: Excellent multisig UX — genuinely easy
- ✓Want: Flexible key configurations
- ✓Want: Inheritance planning built-in
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Onramp or Nunchuk better for Bitcoin custody?
Onramp scores 8.7 vs 5.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Onramp leads in 6 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Onramp is best for Family offices and RIAs, while Nunchuk suits Families and Teams.
What is the difference between Onramp and Nunchuk?
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider, while Nunchuk is a collaborative custody provider. Onramp excels in Counterparty Diversification, whereas Nunchuk is strongest in Withdrawal Flexibility.
How do Onramp and Nunchuk fees compare?
Onramp charges Contact for pricing annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) transaction fees. Nunchuk charges See setup (subscription model) annual custody fees with No transaction fees transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Onramp or Nunchuk?
Onramp scores 9.5/10 for security while Nunchuk scores 8.0/10. Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management, and Nunchuk uses Collaborative multisig wallet.
Related
Explore More
Onramp Full Review
Deep dive into Onramp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Nunchuk Full Review
Deep dive into Nunchuk's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison