Onramp vs Foundation Passport — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Onramp and Foundation Passport across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Onramp scores 8.7 vs Foundation Passport's 5.6. Onramp leads in 6 of 8 categories.
Onramp is better suited for Family offices, RIAs, HNW individuals. Foundation Passport is better suited for Design-conscious Bitcoiners, Air-gap enthusiasts, Open-source advocates.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Onramp | Foundation Passport | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.5 | 9.0 | Onramp |
| Insurance | 15% | 9.0 | 1.0 | Onramp |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.5 | 1.0 | Onramp |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.5 | 9.0 | Foundation Passport |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.0 | 6.5 | Onramp |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 9.0 | Foundation Passport |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.5 | 2.0 | Onramp |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 10.0 | 9.5 | Onramp |
| Overall Score | 100% | 8.7 | 5.6 | Onramp |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Onramp and Foundation Passport across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.5 vs 9.0)
Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management with Varies by underlying custodian in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). Incident history: No incidents.
Foundation Passport uses Air-gapped hardware wallet with camera key management with 100% in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Open-source audited. Incident history: No known compromises.
Insurance (9.0 vs 1.0)
Onramp offers Aggregate coverage across multiple custodian insurance policies via Multiple (via underlying custodians). Each underlying custodian maintains their own insurance. Combined coverage exceeds single-custodian limits.
Foundation Passport offers None — self-custody hardware via N/A. Hardware wallet. Full user responsibility.
Regulatory (8.5 vs 1.0)
Onramp holds State money transmitter licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Regulated through underlying custodian partnerships with qualified custodians
Foundation Passport holds N/A — hardware manufacturer and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States. Foundation Devices Inc. US-based open-source hardware company.
Fee Transparency (7.5 vs 9.0)
Onramp charges Contact for pricing in annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) per transaction. Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Foundation Passport charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Premium device. Air-gapped via QR codes and microSD.
Track Record (8.0 vs 6.5)
Onramp was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $1B+. Incident history: No incidents.
Foundation Passport was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Boston, MA. AUM: N/A (hardware manufacturer). Incident history: No known compromises.
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 9.0)
Onramp withdrawal fees: Contact for pricing. Minimum account: $100,000. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Foundation Passport withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$199 (Passport). Supported assets: Bitcoin only.
Reporting & Audit (8.5 vs 2.0)
Onramp: SOC compliance is Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Foundation Passport: SOC compliance is Open-source audited. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (10.0 vs 9.5)
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider. Key management: Multi-institution distributed custody — keys and assets spread across multiple independent regulated custodians (BitGo, Coinbase, Fidelity, etc.).
Foundation Passport is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: Air-gapped Bitcoin wallet with camera for QR code scanning. Open-source hardware..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Onramp and Foundation Passport.
| Fee Type | Onramp | Foundation Passport |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Contact for pricing | $199 (device purchase) |
| Annual Custody | Contact for pricing | None |
| Transaction | 0.50% per trade (brokerage) | Network fees only |
| Withdrawal | Contact for pricing | Network fees only |
Onramp: Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Foundation Passport: Premium device. Air-gapped via QR codes and microSD.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Onramp | Foundation Passport |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5% cashback card | ✓ | ✗ |
| 5% APY on cash balances | ✓ | ✗ |
| Air-gapped QR scanning | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bitcoin brokerage services (Onramp Finance) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Camera-based signing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Envoy companion app | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade security and compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| MicroSD backup | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-Institution Custody across multiple regulated custodians | ✓ | ✗ |
| No single point of failure | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open-source hardware + firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| Premium build quality | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-glove onboarding for institutions | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Onramp is better if you…
- ✓Are a family offices
- ✓Are a rias
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a institutions
- ✓Want: Only provider offering true multi-institution custody — no single point of failure
- ✓Want: Aggregated insurance coverage exceeds any single custodian
- ✓Want: $1B+ in assets under custody demonstrates institutional trust
Foundation Passport is better if you…
- ✓Are a design-conscious bitcoiners
- ✓Are a air-gap enthusiasts
- ✓Are a open-source advocates
- ✓Are a us-made seekers
- ✓Want: Beautiful premium design
- ✓Want: Truly air-gapped with QR camera
- ✓Want: Open-source hardware AND firmware
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Onramp or Foundation Passport better for Bitcoin custody?
Onramp scores 8.7 vs 5.6 in our weighted Custody Score. Onramp leads in 6 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Onramp is best for Family offices and RIAs, while Foundation Passport suits Design-conscious Bitcoiners and Air-gap enthusiasts.
What is the difference between Onramp and Foundation Passport?
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider, while Foundation Passport is a cold storage / hardware provider. Onramp excels in Counterparty Diversification, whereas Foundation Passport is strongest in Counterparty Diversification.
How do Onramp and Foundation Passport fees compare?
Onramp charges Contact for pricing annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) transaction fees. Foundation Passport charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Onramp or Foundation Passport?
Onramp scores 9.5/10 for security while Foundation Passport scores 9.0/10. Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management, and Foundation Passport uses Air-gapped hardware wallet with camera.
Related
Explore More
Onramp Full Review
Deep dive into Onramp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Foundation Passport Full Review
Deep dive into Foundation Passport's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison