Onramp vs Casa — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Onramp and Casa across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Onramp scores 8.7 vs Casa's 6.7. Onramp leads in 5 of 8 categories.
Onramp is better suited for Family offices, RIAs, HNW individuals. Casa is better suited for HNW individuals, Families, Privacy-focused holders.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Onramp | Casa | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.5 | 8.0 | Onramp |
| Insurance | 15% | 9.0 | 3.5 | Onramp |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.5 | 4.5 | Onramp |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.5 | 9.0 | Casa |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.0 | 8.0 | Tie |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 9.5 | Casa |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.5 | 5.0 | Onramp |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 10.0 | 6.5 | Onramp |
| Overall Score | 100% | 8.7 | 6.7 | Onramp |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Onramp and Casa across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.5 vs 8.0)
Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management with Varies by underlying custodian in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). Incident history: No incidents.
Casa uses Collaborative multisig (2-of-3 or 3-of-5) key management with 100% (hardware wallets) in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No incidents.
Insurance (9.0 vs 3.5)
Onramp offers Aggregate coverage across multiple custodian insurance policies via Multiple (via underlying custodians). Each underlying custodian maintains their own insurance. Combined coverage exceeds single-custodian limits.
Casa offers Limited — similar to Unchained model. Client bears primary key responsibility. via Not publicly disclosed. Casa insures their own key. Client keys are client responsibility. Casa Covenant provides inheritance recovery mechanism.
Regulatory (8.5 vs 4.5)
Onramp holds State money transmitter licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Regulated through underlying custodian partnerships with qualified custodians
Casa holds FinCEN MSB registration and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States. Not a qualified custodian — self-custody model. Registered as money services business.
Fee Transparency (7.5 vs 9.0)
Onramp charges Contact for pricing in annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) per transaction. Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Casa charges $30/month (Standard) / $178/month (Premium) / Custom (Diamond) in annual custody fees with No transaction fees per transaction. Diamond tier includes dedicated advisor, custom security review, and Covenant inheritance protocol.
Track Record (8.0 vs 8.0)
Onramp was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $1B+. Incident history: No incidents.
Casa was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Denver, CO. AUM: Not publicly disclosed. Incident history: No incidents.
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 9.5)
Onramp withdrawal fees: Contact for pricing. Minimum account: $100,000. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Casa withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum.
Reporting & Audit (8.5 vs 5.0)
Onramp: SOC compliance is Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Casa: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (10.0 vs 6.5)
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider. Key management: Multi-institution distributed custody — keys and assets spread across multiple independent regulated custodians (BitGo, Coinbase, Fidelity, etc.).
Casa is a collaborative custody provider. Key management: 2-of-3 (Standard) or 3-of-5 (Premium) multisig. Casa holds 1 key, client holds rest on hardware wallets + mobile..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Onramp and Casa.
| Fee Type | Onramp | Casa |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Contact for pricing | Included in subscription |
| Annual Custody | Contact for pricing | $30/month (Standard) / $178/month (Premium) / Custom (Diamond) |
| Transaction | 0.50% per trade (brokerage) | No transaction fees |
| Withdrawal | Contact for pricing | Network fees only |
Onramp: Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Casa: Diamond tier includes dedicated advisor, custom security review, and Covenant inheritance protocol.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Onramp | Casa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5% cashback card | ✓ | ✗ |
| 2-of-3 and 3-of-5 multisig options | ✗ | ✓ |
| 5% APY on cash balances | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin brokerage services (Onramp Finance) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Casa Covenant inheritance protocol | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated security advisors (Premium+) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Geographic key distribution guidance | ✗ | ✓ |
| Health check system for key verification | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade security and compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Key rotation and replacement | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile app for easy key management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-Institution Custody across multiple regulated custodians | ✓ | ✗ |
| No single point of failure | ✓ | ✗ |
| White-glove onboarding for institutions | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Onramp is better if you…
- ✓Are a family offices
- ✓Are a rias
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a institutions
- ✓Want: Only provider offering true multi-institution custody — no single point of failure
- ✓Want: Aggregated insurance coverage exceeds any single custodian
- ✓Want: $1B+ in assets under custody demonstrates institutional trust
Casa is better if you…
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a families
- ✓Are a privacy-focused holders
- ✓Are a non-technical bitcoin holders
- ✓Want: Best-in-class UX for self-custody — genuinely easy to use
- ✓Want: 3-of-5 multisig is one of the most secure consumer setups available
- ✓Want: Casa Covenant solves the inheritance problem elegantly
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Onramp or Casa better for Bitcoin custody?
Onramp scores 8.7 vs 6.7 in our weighted Custody Score. Onramp leads in 5 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Onramp is best for Family offices and RIAs, while Casa suits HNW individuals and Families.
What is the difference between Onramp and Casa?
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider, while Casa is a collaborative custody provider. Onramp excels in Counterparty Diversification, whereas Casa is strongest in Withdrawal Flexibility.
How do Onramp and Casa fees compare?
Onramp charges Contact for pricing annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) transaction fees. Casa charges $30/month (Standard) / $178/month (Premium) / Custom (Diamond) annual custody fees with No transaction fees transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Onramp or Casa?
Onramp scores 9.5/10 for security while Casa scores 8.0/10. Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management, and Casa uses Collaborative multisig (2-of-3 or 3-of-5).
Related
Explore More
Onramp Full Review
Deep dive into Onramp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Casa Full Review
Deep dive into Casa's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison