Onramp vs Bitstamp — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Onramp and Bitstamp across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Onramp scores 8.7 vs Bitstamp's 7.5. Onramp leads in 5 of 8 categories.
Onramp is better suited for Family offices, RIAs, HNW individuals. Bitstamp is better suited for European investors, Institutional traders, Long-term exchange users.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Onramp | Bitstamp | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.5 | 7.5 | Onramp |
| Insurance | 15% | 9.0 | 6.5 | Onramp |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.5 | 8.5 | Tie |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.5 | 8.0 | Bitstamp |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.0 | 8.0 | Tie |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 8.0 | Onramp |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.5 | 7.5 | Onramp |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 10.0 | 3.0 | Onramp |
| Overall Score | 100% | 8.7 | 7.5 | Onramp |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Onramp and Bitstamp across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.5 vs 7.5)
Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management with Varies by underlying custodian in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). Incident history: No incidents.
Bitstamp uses BitGo custody partnership key management with 95%+ in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: 2015 hot wallet breach (19,000 BTC). Fully repaid users..
Insurance (9.0 vs 6.5)
Onramp offers Aggregate coverage across multiple custodian insurance policies via Multiple (via underlying custodians). Each underlying custodian maintains their own insurance. Combined coverage exceeds single-custodian limits.
Bitstamp offers BitGo custody insurance for cold storage via Via BitGo. Cold storage through BitGo with insurance coverage.
Regulatory (8.5 vs 8.5)
Onramp holds State money transmitter licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Regulated through underlying custodian partnerships with qualified custodians
Bitstamp holds Luxembourg payment institution license, FCA registered (UK), Multiple EU licenses and is not a qualified custodian operating in Luxembourg / EU / Global. Luxembourg-licensed. One of the most established exchanges globally.
Fee Transparency (7.5 vs 8.0)
Onramp charges Contact for pricing in annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) per transaction. Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Bitstamp charges None in annual custody fees with 0.0-0.4% tiered per transaction. Competitive tiered fee structure. One of Europe's most established exchanges.
Track Record (8.0 vs 8.0)
Onramp was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $1B+. Incident history: No incidents.
Bitstamp was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Luxembourg. AUM: $5B+ trading volume. Incident history: 2015 hot wallet breach (19,000 BTC). Fully repaid users..
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 8.0)
Onramp withdrawal fees: Contact for pricing. Minimum account: $100,000. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
Bitstamp withdrawal fees: Network fees. Minimum account: $10 minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 80+ cryptocurrencies.
Reporting & Audit (8.5 vs 7.5)
Onramp: SOC compliance is Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Bitstamp: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (10.0 vs 3.0)
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider. Key management: Multi-institution distributed custody — keys and assets spread across multiple independent regulated custodians (BitGo, Coinbase, Fidelity, etc.).
Bitstamp is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed custody with BitGo partnership for cold storage..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Onramp and Bitstamp.
| Fee Type | Onramp | Bitstamp |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Contact for pricing | Free |
| Annual Custody | Contact for pricing | None |
| Transaction | 0.50% per trade (brokerage) | 0.0-0.4% tiered |
| Withdrawal | Contact for pricing | Network fees |
Onramp: Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
Bitstamp: Competitive tiered fee structure. One of Europe's most established exchanges.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Onramp | Bitstamp |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5% cashback card | ✓ | ✗ |
| 13+ year track record | ✗ | ✓ |
| 5% APY on cash balances | ✓ | ✗ |
| BitGo custody partnership | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bitcoin brokerage services (Onramp Finance) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Institutional API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade security and compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Low trading fees | ✗ | ✓ |
| Luxembourg banking license | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-Institution Custody across multiple regulated custodians | ✓ | ✗ |
| No single point of failure | ✓ | ✗ |
| SEPA/SWIFT support | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-glove onboarding for institutions | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Onramp is better if you…
- ✓Are a family offices
- ✓Are a rias
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a institutions
- ✓Want: Only provider offering true multi-institution custody — no single point of failure
- ✓Want: Aggregated insurance coverage exceeds any single custodian
- ✓Want: $1B+ in assets under custody demonstrates institutional trust
Bitstamp is better if you…
- ✓Are a european investors
- ✓Are a institutional traders
- ✓Are a long-term exchange users
- ✓Are a fiat gateway seekers
- ✓Want: 13+ year track record — among oldest exchanges
- ✓Want: Luxembourg banking license
- ✓Want: Competitive fee structure
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Onramp or Bitstamp better for Bitcoin custody?
Onramp scores 8.7 vs 7.5 in our weighted Custody Score. Onramp leads in 5 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Onramp is best for Family offices and RIAs, while Bitstamp suits European investors and Institutional traders.
What is the difference between Onramp and Bitstamp?
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider, while Bitstamp is a exchange custody provider. Onramp excels in Counterparty Diversification, whereas Bitstamp is strongest in Regulatory.
How do Onramp and Bitstamp fees compare?
Onramp charges Contact for pricing annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) transaction fees. Bitstamp charges None annual custody fees with 0.0-0.4% tiered transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Onramp or Bitstamp?
Onramp scores 9.5/10 for security while Bitstamp scores 7.5/10. Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management, and Bitstamp uses BitGo custody partnership.
Related
Explore More
Onramp Full Review
Deep dive into Onramp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Bitstamp Full Review
Deep dive into Bitstamp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison