Onramp vs BitBox02 — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Onramp and BitBox02 across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Onramp scores 8.7 vs BitBox02's 5.9. Onramp leads in 6 of 8 categories.
Onramp is better suited for Family offices, RIAs, HNW individuals. BitBox02 is better suited for Privacy-focused users, Swiss quality seekers, Bitcoin-only users.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Onramp | BitBox02 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.5 | 9.0 | Onramp |
| Insurance | 15% | 9.0 | 1.0 | Onramp |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.5 | 2.0 | Onramp |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.5 | 9.5 | BitBox02 |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.0 | 7.0 | Onramp |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 9.5 | BitBox02 |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.5 | 2.0 | Onramp |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 10.0 | 9.0 | Onramp |
| Overall Score | 100% | 8.7 | 5.9 | Onramp |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Onramp and BitBox02 across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.5 vs 9.0)
Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management with Varies by underlying custodian in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). Incident history: No incidents.
BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet key management with 100% in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Open-source audited. Incident history: No known compromises.
Insurance (9.0 vs 1.0)
Onramp offers Aggregate coverage across multiple custodian insurance policies via Multiple (via underlying custodians). Each underlying custodian maintains their own insurance. Combined coverage exceeds single-custodian limits.
BitBox02 offers None — self-custody hardware via N/A. Hardware wallet. Full user responsibility.
Regulatory (8.5 vs 2.0)
Onramp holds State money transmitter licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Regulated through underlying custodian partnerships with qualified custodians
BitBox02 holds N/A — hardware manufacturer and is not a qualified custodian operating in Switzerland. Shift Crypto AG — Swiss-registered company.
Fee Transparency (7.5 vs 9.5)
Onramp charges Contact for pricing in annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) per transaction. Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
BitBox02 charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.
Track Record (8.0 vs 7.0)
Onramp was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Austin, TX. AUM: $1B+. Incident history: No incidents.
BitBox02 was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland. AUM: N/A (hardware manufacturer). Incident history: No known compromises.
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 9.5)
Onramp withdrawal fees: Contact for pricing. Minimum account: $100,000. Supported assets: Bitcoin.
BitBox02 withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$149 (Multi) / ~$129 (Bitcoin-only). Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 1,500+ (Multi edition).
Reporting & Audit (8.5 vs 2.0)
Onramp: SOC compliance is Via underlying custodians (SOC 1 & SOC 2). As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
BitBox02: SOC compliance is Open-source audited. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (10.0 vs 9.0)
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider. Key management: Multi-institution distributed custody — keys and assets spread across multiple independent regulated custodians (BitGo, Coinbase, Fidelity, etc.).
BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: Dual-chip hardware wallet. Open-source. Swiss-made. Touch slider interface..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Onramp and BitBox02.
| Fee Type | Onramp | BitBox02 |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Contact for pricing | $129-$149 (device purchase) |
| Annual Custody | Contact for pricing | None |
| Transaction | 0.50% per trade (brokerage) | Network fees only |
| Withdrawal | Contact for pricing | Network fees only |
Onramp: Also offers Onramp Finance: lowest-cost Bitcoin brokerage at 50bps, 5% APY on cash, 1.5% cashback card
BitBox02: Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Onramp | BitBox02 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5% cashback card | ✓ | ✗ |
| 5% APY on cash balances | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin brokerage services (Onramp Finance) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin-only edition | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dual-chip architecture | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade security and compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| MicroSD backup | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-Institution Custody across multiple regulated custodians | ✓ | ✗ |
| No single point of failure | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open-source firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tor support via BitBoxApp | ✗ | ✓ |
| Touch sliders | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-glove onboarding for institutions | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Onramp is better if you…
- ✓Are a family offices
- ✓Are a rias
- ✓Are a hnw individuals
- ✓Are a institutions
- ✓Want: Only provider offering true multi-institution custody — no single point of failure
- ✓Want: Aggregated insurance coverage exceeds any single custodian
- ✓Want: $1B+ in assets under custody demonstrates institutional trust
BitBox02 is better if you…
- ✓Are a privacy-focused users
- ✓Are a swiss quality seekers
- ✓Are a bitcoin-only users
- ✓Are a minimalists
- ✓Want: Swiss-made quality and security
- ✓Want: Dual-chip architecture
- ✓Want: Fully open-source
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Onramp or BitBox02 better for Bitcoin custody?
Onramp scores 8.7 vs 5.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Onramp leads in 6 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Onramp is best for Family offices and RIAs, while BitBox02 suits Privacy-focused users and Swiss quality seekers.
What is the difference between Onramp and BitBox02?
Onramp is a multi-institution custody provider, while BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider. Onramp excels in Counterparty Diversification, whereas BitBox02 is strongest in Fee Transparency.
How do Onramp and BitBox02 fees compare?
Onramp charges Contact for pricing annual custody fees with 0.50% per trade (brokerage) transaction fees. BitBox02 charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Onramp or BitBox02?
Onramp scores 9.5/10 for security while BitBox02 scores 9.0/10. Onramp uses Multi-institution distributed key management, and BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet.
Related
Explore More
Onramp Full Review
Deep dive into Onramp's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
BitBox02 Full Review
Deep dive into BitBox02's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison