Kraken vs Strike — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison

An independent, data-driven comparison of Kraken and Strike across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.

Quick Verdict

Kraken scores 7.6 vs Strike's 5.7. Kraken leads in 6 of 8 categories.

Kraken is better suited for Active traders, Security-conscious exchange users, International users. Strike is better suited for Lightning Network users, Fee-conscious buyers, International remittance users.

7.6
GoodCustody Score
Kraken
vs
5.7
Below AverageCustody Score
Strike

Score Comparison

Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.

CriterionWeightKrakenStrikeWinner
Security20%8.56.5Kraken
Insurance15%5.53.0Kraken
Regulatory15%8.06.5Kraken
Fee Transparency10%8.07.0Kraken
Track Record15%9.06.0Kraken
Withdrawal Flexibility10%8.59.0Strike
Reporting & Audit10%8.04.0Kraken
Counterparty Diversification5%2.02.0Tie
Overall Score100%
7.6
5.7
Kraken

Score Radar

Visual overlay of Kraken and Strike across all categories.

SecurityInsuranceRegulatoryFeesTrack RecordWithdrawalsReportingDiversification
KrakenStrike

Category-by-Category Analysis

A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.

Security (8.5 vs 6.5)

Kraken uses Exchange hot/cold wallet system key management with 95%+ cold storage in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: No major security breaches in 13+ years.

Strike uses Exchange-managed custody key management with Not disclosed in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No incidents.

Insurance (5.5 vs 3.0)

Kraken offers Not explicitly disclosed via N/A. Maintains significant cold storage reserves. Proof of reserves verified.

Strike offers Not publicly disclosed via N/A. Regulated US money transmitter. Custodial for Bitcoin held on platform.

Regulatory (8.0 vs 6.5)

Kraken holds FinCEN MSB, State money transmitter licenses, FCA registered (UK), AUSTRAC (Australia) and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States / Global. One of the most compliant global exchanges. Bank partnership for USD.

Strike holds FinCEN MSB, State money transmitter licenses and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States. US-regulated. Focus on payments and Lightning Network.

Fee Transparency (8.0 vs 7.0)

Kraken charges None in annual custody fees with 0.16-0.26% maker/taker per transaction. Competitive trading fees. Free ACH deposits. Proof of reserves audited.

Strike charges None in annual custody fees with ~0.0-0.99% (variable spread) per transaction. Among lowest Bitcoin buying fees. Free Lightning withdrawals.

Track Record (9.0 vs 6.0)

Kraken was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA. AUM: $20B+ in quarterly trading volume. Incident history: No major security breaches in 13+ years.

Strike was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Chicago, IL. AUM: Not publicly disclosed. Incident history: No incidents.

Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 9.0)

Kraken withdrawal fees: Network fees + small flat fee. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 200+ cryptocurrencies.

Strike withdrawal fees: Free via Lightning / Network fees on-chain. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin only.

Reporting & Audit (8.0 vs 4.0)

Kraken: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Strike: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Counterparty Diversification (2.0 vs 2.0)

Kraken is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed hot/cold wallet system with proof of reserves..

Strike is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Bitcoin purchase and Lightning Network payment app..

Fee Comparison

Side-by-side fee breakdown for Kraken and Strike.

Fee TypeKrakenStrike
Setup FeeFreeFree
Annual CustodyNoneNone
Transaction0.16-0.26% maker/taker~0.0-0.99% (variable spread)
WithdrawalNetwork fees + small flat feeFree via Lightning / Network fees on-chain

Kraken: Competitive trading fees. Free ACH deposits. Proof of reserves audited.

Strike: Among lowest Bitcoin buying fees. Free Lightning withdrawals.

Feature Comparison

Checklist of features across both providers.

FeatureKrakenStrike
13+ year track record
24/7 customer support
95%+ cold storage
Bitcoin payment rails
Clean mobile app
Futures and margin trading
Instant Bitcoin purchases
International transfers
Lightning Network native
Near-zero buying fees
Proof of reserves
Staking services

Who Should Choose Which?

Kraken is better if you…

  • Are a active traders
  • Are a security-conscious exchange users
  • Are a international users
  • Are a stakers
  • Want: 13+ year track record with zero major breaches
  • Want: Proof of reserves — verified by third party
  • Want: 95%+ assets in cold storage

Strike is better if you…

  • Are a lightning network users
  • Are a fee-conscious buyers
  • Are a international remittance users
  • Are a bitcoin payment users
  • Want: Lowest Bitcoin buying fees
  • Want: Lightning Network integration
  • Want: Instant purchases

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kraken or Strike better for Bitcoin custody?

Kraken scores 7.6 vs 5.7 in our weighted Custody Score. Kraken leads in 6 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Kraken is best for Active traders and Security-conscious exchange users, while Strike suits Lightning Network users and Fee-conscious buyers.

What is the difference between Kraken and Strike?

Kraken is a exchange custody provider, while Strike is a exchange custody provider. Kraken excels in Track Record, whereas Strike is strongest in Withdrawal Flexibility.

How do Kraken and Strike fees compare?

Kraken charges None annual custody fees with 0.16-0.26% maker/taker transaction fees. Strike charges None annual custody fees with ~0.0-0.99% (variable spread) transaction fees.

Which is more secure, Kraken or Strike?

Kraken scores 8.5/10 for security while Strike scores 6.5/10. Kraken uses Exchange hot/cold wallet system key management, and Strike uses Exchange-managed custody.