Interactive Brokers vs Robinhood — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Interactive Brokers and Robinhood across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Interactive Brokers scores 6.9 vs Robinhood's 6.9. Interactive Brokers leads in 3 of 8 categories.
Interactive Brokers is better suited for Professional traders, Multi-asset investors, RIAs adding crypto. Robinhood is better suited for Stock traders adding crypto, Fee-conscious traders, Beginners.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Interactive Brokers | Robinhood | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 6.5 | 7.0 | Robinhood |
| Insurance | 15% | 5.0 | 6.0 | Robinhood |
| Regulatory | 15% | 9.0 | 8.5 | Interactive Brokers |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 7.0 | 6.0 | Interactive Brokers |
| Track Record | 15% | 9.5 | 7.0 | Interactive Brokers |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 5.0 | 7.5 | Robinhood |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.0 | 8.0 | Tie |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 2.0 | 2.0 | Tie |
| Overall Score | 100% | 6.9 | 6.9 | Tie |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Interactive Brokers and Robinhood across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (6.5 vs 7.0)
Interactive Brokers uses Paxos custody partnership key management with Via Paxos in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: No major incidents in 45+ year history.
Robinhood uses Exchange-managed custody key management with Majority cold in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: 2021 data breach (customer info, not funds). Crypto wallets added later..
Insurance (5.0 vs 6.0)
Interactive Brokers offers SIPC up to $500K for securities (NOT crypto) via SIPC + excess. World-class securities insurance. Crypto is NOT insured.
Robinhood offers SIPC for securities (NOT crypto). Crime insurance for crypto. via SIPC (securities) + crime insurance. SIPC coverage for stocks. Crypto has separate crime insurance.
Regulatory (9.0 vs 8.5)
Interactive Brokers holds SEC registered, FINRA member, SIPC member, Global regulatory licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States / Global. One of the most regulated brokerages globally.
Robinhood holds NASDAQ listed (HOOD), SEC/FINRA registered (securities), State money transmitter licenses (crypto) and is a qualified custodian operating in United States. Publicly traded. SEC registered for securities. State-licensed for crypto.
Fee Transparency (7.0 vs 6.0)
Interactive Brokers charges None in annual custody fees with 0.12-0.18% tiered per transaction. Among lowest crypto trading fees. But no crypto withdrawals — must sell to withdraw.
Robinhood charges None in annual custody fees with 0% commission (spread-based ~0.4%) per transaction. Commission-free trading. Revenue from spread and payment for order flow.
Track Record (9.5 vs 7.0)
Interactive Brokers was founded in 1978 and is headquartered in Greenwich, CT. AUM: $400B+ client equity. Incident history: No major incidents in 45+ year history.
Robinhood was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Menlo Park, CA. AUM: $130B+ in assets under custody (all assets). Incident history: 2021 data breach (customer info, not funds). Crypto wallets added later..
Withdrawal Flexibility (5.0 vs 7.5)
Interactive Brokers withdrawal fees: Not available (no crypto transfers out). Minimum account: No minimum for crypto. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Limited crypto selection.
Robinhood withdrawal fees: Network fees. Minimum account: $1 minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 20+ cryptocurrencies.
Reporting & Audit (8.0 vs 8.0)
Interactive Brokers: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Robinhood: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Counterparty Diversification (2.0 vs 2.0)
Interactive Brokers is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed custody via Paxos partnership..
Robinhood is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed custody with option to withdraw crypto to external wallets..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Interactive Brokers and Robinhood.
| Fee Type | Interactive Brokers | Robinhood |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Free | Free |
| Annual Custody | None | None |
| Transaction | 0.12-0.18% tiered | 0% commission (spread-based ~0.4%) |
| Withdrawal | Not available (no crypto transfers out) | Network fees |
Interactive Brokers: Among lowest crypto trading fees. But no crypto withdrawals — must sell to withdraw.
Robinhood: Commission-free trading. Revenue from spread and payment for order flow.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Interactive Brokers | Robinhood |
|---|---|---|
| 23M+ funded accounts | ✗ | ✓ |
| 45+ year track record | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitstamp acquisition | ✗ | ✓ |
| Clean mobile interface | ✗ | ✓ |
| Commission-free trading | ✗ | ✓ |
| Crypto alongside stocks | ✗ | ✓ |
| Crypto alongside stocks/bonds/options | ✓ | ✗ |
| Crypto wallets with withdrawals | ✗ | ✓ |
| Global presence | ✓ | ✗ |
| Institutional-grade execution | ✓ | ✗ |
| Lowest crypto trading fees | ✓ | ✗ |
| Professional trading tools | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Interactive Brokers is better if you…
- ✓Are a professional traders
- ✓Are a multi-asset investors
- ✓Are a rias adding crypto
- ✓Are a institutional traders
- ✓Want: 45+ year track record — most established broker
- ✓Want: Lowest crypto trading fees (0.12-0.18%)
- ✓Want: Crypto alongside stocks/bonds/options
Robinhood is better if you…
- ✓Are a stock traders adding crypto
- ✓Are a fee-conscious traders
- ✓Are a beginners
- ✓Are a us retail investors
- ✓Want: Commission-free crypto trading
- ✓Want: Crypto alongside stock portfolio
- ✓Want: Publicly traded — transparent
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Interactive Brokers or Robinhood better for Bitcoin custody?
Interactive Brokers scores 6.9 vs 6.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Interactive Brokers leads in 3 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Interactive Brokers is best for Professional traders and Multi-asset investors, while Robinhood suits Stock traders adding crypto and Fee-conscious traders.
What is the difference between Interactive Brokers and Robinhood?
Interactive Brokers is a exchange custody provider, while Robinhood is a exchange custody provider. Interactive Brokers excels in Track Record, whereas Robinhood is strongest in Regulatory.
How do Interactive Brokers and Robinhood fees compare?
Interactive Brokers charges None annual custody fees with 0.12-0.18% tiered transaction fees. Robinhood charges None annual custody fees with 0% commission (spread-based ~0.4%) transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Interactive Brokers or Robinhood?
Interactive Brokers scores 6.5/10 for security while Robinhood scores 7.0/10. Interactive Brokers uses Paxos custody partnership key management, and Robinhood uses Exchange-managed custody.
Related
Explore More
Interactive Brokers Full Review
Deep dive into Interactive Brokers's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Robinhood Full Review
Deep dive into Robinhood's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison