Kraken vs Interactive Brokers — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Kraken and Interactive Brokers across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Kraken scores 7.6 vs Interactive Brokers's 6.9. Kraken leads in 4 of 8 categories.
Kraken is better suited for Active traders, Security-conscious exchange users, International users. Interactive Brokers is better suited for Professional traders, Multi-asset investors, RIAs adding crypto.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Kraken | Interactive Brokers | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 8.5 | 6.5 | Kraken |
| Insurance | 15% | 5.5 | 5.0 | Kraken |
| Regulatory | 15% | 8.0 | 9.0 | Interactive Brokers |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 8.0 | 7.0 | Kraken |
| Track Record | 15% | 9.0 | 9.5 | Interactive Brokers |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 8.5 | 5.0 | Kraken |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 8.0 | 8.0 | Tie |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 2.0 | 2.0 | Tie |
| Overall Score | 100% | 7.6 | 6.9 | Kraken |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Kraken and Interactive Brokers across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (8.5 vs 6.5)
Kraken uses Exchange hot/cold wallet system key management with 95%+ cold storage in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: No major security breaches in 13+ years.
Interactive Brokers uses Paxos custody partnership key management with Via Paxos in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: No major incidents in 45+ year history.
Insurance (5.5 vs 5.0)
Kraken offers Not explicitly disclosed via N/A. Maintains significant cold storage reserves. Proof of reserves verified.
Interactive Brokers offers SIPC up to $500K for securities (NOT crypto) via SIPC + excess. World-class securities insurance. Crypto is NOT insured.
Regulatory (8.0 vs 9.0)
Kraken holds FinCEN MSB, State money transmitter licenses, FCA registered (UK), AUSTRAC (Australia) and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States / Global. One of the most compliant global exchanges. Bank partnership for USD.
Interactive Brokers holds SEC registered, FINRA member, SIPC member, Global regulatory licenses and is a qualified custodian operating in United States / Global. One of the most regulated brokerages globally.
Fee Transparency (8.0 vs 7.0)
Kraken charges None in annual custody fees with 0.16-0.26% maker/taker per transaction. Competitive trading fees. Free ACH deposits. Proof of reserves audited.
Interactive Brokers charges None in annual custody fees with 0.12-0.18% tiered per transaction. Among lowest crypto trading fees. But no crypto withdrawals — must sell to withdraw.
Track Record (9.0 vs 9.5)
Kraken was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA. AUM: $20B+ in quarterly trading volume. Incident history: No major security breaches in 13+ years.
Interactive Brokers was founded in 1978 and is headquartered in Greenwich, CT. AUM: $400B+ client equity. Incident history: No major incidents in 45+ year history.
Withdrawal Flexibility (8.5 vs 5.0)
Kraken withdrawal fees: Network fees + small flat fee. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 200+ cryptocurrencies.
Interactive Brokers withdrawal fees: Not available (no crypto transfers out). Minimum account: No minimum for crypto. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Limited crypto selection.
Reporting & Audit (8.0 vs 8.0)
Kraken: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Interactive Brokers: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. As a qualified custodian, it meets SEC reporting requirements.
Counterparty Diversification (2.0 vs 2.0)
Kraken is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed hot/cold wallet system with proof of reserves..
Interactive Brokers is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed custody via Paxos partnership..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Kraken and Interactive Brokers.
| Fee Type | Kraken | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | Free | Free |
| Annual Custody | None | None |
| Transaction | 0.16-0.26% maker/taker | 0.12-0.18% tiered |
| Withdrawal | Network fees + small flat fee | Not available (no crypto transfers out) |
Kraken: Competitive trading fees. Free ACH deposits. Proof of reserves audited.
Interactive Brokers: Among lowest crypto trading fees. But no crypto withdrawals — must sell to withdraw.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Kraken | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| 13+ year track record | ✓ | ✗ |
| 24/7 customer support | ✓ | ✗ |
| 45+ year track record | ✗ | ✓ |
| 95%+ cold storage | ✓ | ✗ |
| Crypto alongside stocks/bonds/options | ✗ | ✓ |
| Futures and margin trading | ✓ | ✗ |
| Global presence | ✗ | ✓ |
| Institutional-grade execution | ✗ | ✓ |
| Lowest crypto trading fees | ✗ | ✓ |
| Professional trading tools | ✗ | ✓ |
| Proof of reserves | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staking services | ✓ | ✗ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Kraken is better if you…
- ✓Are a active traders
- ✓Are a security-conscious exchange users
- ✓Are a international users
- ✓Are a stakers
- ✓Want: 13+ year track record with zero major breaches
- ✓Want: Proof of reserves — verified by third party
- ✓Want: 95%+ assets in cold storage
Interactive Brokers is better if you…
- ✓Are a professional traders
- ✓Are a multi-asset investors
- ✓Are a rias adding crypto
- ✓Are a institutional traders
- ✓Want: 45+ year track record — most established broker
- ✓Want: Lowest crypto trading fees (0.12-0.18%)
- ✓Want: Crypto alongside stocks/bonds/options
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kraken or Interactive Brokers better for Bitcoin custody?
Kraken scores 7.6 vs 6.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Kraken leads in 4 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Kraken is best for Active traders and Security-conscious exchange users, while Interactive Brokers suits Professional traders and Multi-asset investors.
What is the difference between Kraken and Interactive Brokers?
Kraken is a exchange custody provider, while Interactive Brokers is a exchange custody provider. Kraken excels in Track Record, whereas Interactive Brokers is strongest in Track Record.
How do Kraken and Interactive Brokers fees compare?
Kraken charges None annual custody fees with 0.16-0.26% maker/taker transaction fees. Interactive Brokers charges None annual custody fees with 0.12-0.18% tiered transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Kraken or Interactive Brokers?
Kraken scores 8.5/10 for security while Interactive Brokers scores 6.5/10. Kraken uses Exchange hot/cold wallet system key management, and Interactive Brokers uses Paxos custody partnership.
Related
Explore More
Kraken Full Review
Deep dive into Kraken's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Interactive Brokers Full Review
Deep dive into Interactive Brokers's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison