Bitstamp vs Strike — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison

An independent, data-driven comparison of Bitstamp and Strike across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.

Quick Verdict

Bitstamp scores 7.5 vs Strike's 5.7. Bitstamp leads in 7 of 8 categories.

Bitstamp is better suited for European investors, Institutional traders, Long-term exchange users. Strike is better suited for Lightning Network users, Fee-conscious buyers, International remittance users.

7.5
GoodCustody Score
Bitstamp
vs
5.7
Below AverageCustody Score
Strike

Score Comparison

Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.

CriterionWeightBitstampStrikeWinner
Security20%7.56.5Bitstamp
Insurance15%6.53.0Bitstamp
Regulatory15%8.56.5Bitstamp
Fee Transparency10%8.07.0Bitstamp
Track Record15%8.06.0Bitstamp
Withdrawal Flexibility10%8.09.0Strike
Reporting & Audit10%7.54.0Bitstamp
Counterparty Diversification5%3.02.0Bitstamp
Overall Score100%
7.5
5.7
Bitstamp

Score Radar

Visual overlay of Bitstamp and Strike across all categories.

SecurityInsuranceRegulatoryFeesTrack RecordWithdrawalsReportingDiversification
BitstampStrike

Category-by-Category Analysis

A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.

Security (7.5 vs 6.5)

Bitstamp uses BitGo custody partnership key management with 95%+ in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2. Incident history: 2015 hot wallet breach (19,000 BTC). Fully repaid users..

Strike uses Exchange-managed custody key management with Not disclosed in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No incidents.

Insurance (6.5 vs 3.0)

Bitstamp offers BitGo custody insurance for cold storage via Via BitGo. Cold storage through BitGo with insurance coverage.

Strike offers Not publicly disclosed via N/A. Regulated US money transmitter. Custodial for Bitcoin held on platform.

Regulatory (8.5 vs 6.5)

Bitstamp holds Luxembourg payment institution license, FCA registered (UK), Multiple EU licenses and is not a qualified custodian operating in Luxembourg / EU / Global. Luxembourg-licensed. One of the most established exchanges globally.

Strike holds FinCEN MSB, State money transmitter licenses and is not a qualified custodian operating in United States. US-regulated. Focus on payments and Lightning Network.

Fee Transparency (8.0 vs 7.0)

Bitstamp charges None in annual custody fees with 0.0-0.4% tiered per transaction. Competitive tiered fee structure. One of Europe's most established exchanges.

Strike charges None in annual custody fees with ~0.0-0.99% (variable spread) per transaction. Among lowest Bitcoin buying fees. Free Lightning withdrawals.

Track Record (8.0 vs 6.0)

Bitstamp was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Luxembourg. AUM: $5B+ trading volume. Incident history: 2015 hot wallet breach (19,000 BTC). Fully repaid users..

Strike was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Chicago, IL. AUM: Not publicly disclosed. Incident history: No incidents.

Withdrawal Flexibility (8.0 vs 9.0)

Bitstamp withdrawal fees: Network fees. Minimum account: $10 minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 80+ cryptocurrencies.

Strike withdrawal fees: Free via Lightning / Network fees on-chain. Minimum account: No minimum. Supported assets: Bitcoin only.

Reporting & Audit (7.5 vs 4.0)

Bitstamp: SOC compliance is SOC 2 Type 2. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Strike: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Counterparty Diversification (3.0 vs 2.0)

Bitstamp is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Exchange-managed custody with BitGo partnership for cold storage..

Strike is a exchange custody provider. Key management: Bitcoin purchase and Lightning Network payment app..

Fee Comparison

Side-by-side fee breakdown for Bitstamp and Strike.

Fee TypeBitstampStrike
Setup FeeFreeFree
Annual CustodyNoneNone
Transaction0.0-0.4% tiered~0.0-0.99% (variable spread)
WithdrawalNetwork feesFree via Lightning / Network fees on-chain

Bitstamp: Competitive tiered fee structure. One of Europe's most established exchanges.

Strike: Among lowest Bitcoin buying fees. Free Lightning withdrawals.

Feature Comparison

Checklist of features across both providers.

FeatureBitstampStrike
13+ year track record
BitGo custody partnership
Bitcoin payment rails
Clean mobile app
Instant Bitcoin purchases
Institutional API
International transfers
Lightning Network native
Low trading fees
Luxembourg banking license
Near-zero buying fees
SEPA/SWIFT support

Who Should Choose Which?

Bitstamp is better if you…

  • Are a european investors
  • Are a institutional traders
  • Are a long-term exchange users
  • Are a fiat gateway seekers
  • Want: 13+ year track record — among oldest exchanges
  • Want: Luxembourg banking license
  • Want: Competitive fee structure

Strike is better if you…

  • Are a lightning network users
  • Are a fee-conscious buyers
  • Are a international remittance users
  • Are a bitcoin payment users
  • Want: Lowest Bitcoin buying fees
  • Want: Lightning Network integration
  • Want: Instant purchases

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bitstamp or Strike better for Bitcoin custody?

Bitstamp scores 7.5 vs 5.7 in our weighted Custody Score. Bitstamp leads in 7 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Bitstamp is best for European investors and Institutional traders, while Strike suits Lightning Network users and Fee-conscious buyers.

What is the difference between Bitstamp and Strike?

Bitstamp is a exchange custody provider, while Strike is a exchange custody provider. Bitstamp excels in Regulatory, whereas Strike is strongest in Withdrawal Flexibility.

How do Bitstamp and Strike fees compare?

Bitstamp charges None annual custody fees with 0.0-0.4% tiered transaction fees. Strike charges None annual custody fees with ~0.0-0.99% (variable spread) transaction fees.

Which is more secure, Bitstamp or Strike?

Bitstamp scores 7.5/10 for security while Strike scores 6.5/10. Bitstamp uses BitGo custody partnership key management, and Strike uses Exchange-managed custody.