BitBox02 vs SeedSigner — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of BitBox02 and SeedSigner across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
BitBox02 scores 5.9 vs SeedSigner's 5.4. BitBox02 leads in 5 of 8 categories.
BitBox02 is better suited for Privacy-focused users, Swiss quality seekers, Bitcoin-only users. SeedSigner is better suited for DIY enthusiasts, Cypherpunks, Security researchers.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | BitBox02 | SeedSigner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.0 | 8.5 | BitBox02 |
| Insurance | 15% | 1.0 | 1.0 | Tie |
| Regulatory | 15% | 2.0 | 1.0 | BitBox02 |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 9.5 | 10.0 | SeedSigner |
| Track Record | 15% | 7.0 | 6.0 | BitBox02 |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 9.5 | 8.5 | BitBox02 |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 2.0 | 1.0 | BitBox02 |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 9.0 | 10.0 | SeedSigner |
| Overall Score | 100% | 5.9 | 5.4 | BitBox02 |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of BitBox02 and SeedSigner across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.0 vs 8.5)
BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet key management with 100% in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Open-source audited. Incident history: No known compromises.
SeedSigner uses Stateless signing device key management with 100% (stateless) in cold storage and no confirmed penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No known compromises.
Insurance (1.0 vs 1.0)
BitBox02 offers None — self-custody hardware via N/A. Hardware wallet. Full user responsibility.
SeedSigner offers None — DIY self-custody via N/A. DIY project. No company behind it. No insurance possible.
Regulatory (2.0 vs 1.0)
BitBox02 holds N/A — hardware manufacturer and is not a qualified custodian operating in Switzerland. Shift Crypto AG — Swiss-registered company.
SeedSigner holds N/A — open-source project and is not a qualified custodian operating in Decentralized / Open Source. Community-driven open-source project. No company.
Fee Transparency (9.5 vs 10.0)
BitBox02 charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.
SeedSigner charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Build it yourself from off-the-shelf components. Truly zero trust.
Track Record (7.0 vs 6.0)
BitBox02 was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland. AUM: N/A (hardware manufacturer). Incident history: No known compromises.
SeedSigner was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Open Source. AUM: N/A (DIY project). Incident history: No known compromises.
Withdrawal Flexibility (9.5 vs 8.5)
BitBox02 withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$149 (Multi) / ~$129 (Bitcoin-only). Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 1,500+ (Multi edition).
SeedSigner withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$50 (components). Supported assets: Bitcoin only.
Reporting & Audit (2.0 vs 1.0)
BitBox02: SOC compliance is Open-source audited. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
SeedSigner: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (9.0 vs 10.0)
BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: Dual-chip hardware wallet. Open-source. Swiss-made. Touch slider interface..
SeedSigner is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: DIY stateless signing device. Never stores keys. Camera-based QR code signing. Built from Raspberry Pi Zero..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for BitBox02 and SeedSigner.
| Fee Type | BitBox02 | SeedSigner |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | $129-$149 (device purchase) | ~$50 (Raspberry Pi Zero + camera + screen) |
| Annual Custody | None | None |
| Transaction | Network fees only | Network fees only |
| Withdrawal | Network fees only | Network fees only |
BitBox02: Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.
SeedSigner: Build it yourself from off-the-shelf components. Truly zero trust.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | BitBox02 | SeedSigner |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin-only edition | ✓ | ✗ |
| Camera-based QR signing | ✗ | ✓ |
| DIY from off-the-shelf parts | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dice roll entropy | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dual-chip architecture | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fully open-source | ✗ | ✓ |
| MicroSD backup | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open-source firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Stateless — never stores keys | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tor support via BitBoxApp | ✓ | ✗ |
| Touch sliders | ✓ | ✗ |
| Zero supply chain trust required | ✗ | ✓ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
BitBox02 is better if you…
- ✓Are a privacy-focused users
- ✓Are a swiss quality seekers
- ✓Are a bitcoin-only users
- ✓Are a minimalists
- ✓Want: Swiss-made quality and security
- ✓Want: Dual-chip architecture
- ✓Want: Fully open-source
SeedSigner is better if you…
- ✓Are a diy enthusiasts
- ✓Are a cypherpunks
- ✓Are a security researchers
- ✓Are a ultra-paranoid bitcoiners
- ✓Want: Stateless — keys never stored on device
- ✓Want: Build from off-the-shelf components
- ✓Want: Zero supply chain attack surface
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BitBox02 or SeedSigner better for Bitcoin custody?
BitBox02 scores 5.9 vs 5.4 in our weighted Custody Score. BitBox02 leads in 5 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: BitBox02 is best for Privacy-focused users and Swiss quality seekers, while SeedSigner suits DIY enthusiasts and Cypherpunks.
What is the difference between BitBox02 and SeedSigner?
BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider, while SeedSigner is a cold storage / hardware provider. BitBox02 excels in Fee Transparency, whereas SeedSigner is strongest in Fee Transparency.
How do BitBox02 and SeedSigner fees compare?
BitBox02 charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees. SeedSigner charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees.
Which is more secure, BitBox02 or SeedSigner?
BitBox02 scores 9.0/10 for security while SeedSigner scores 8.5/10. BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet key management, and SeedSigner uses Stateless signing device.
Related
Explore More
BitBox02 Full Review
Deep dive into BitBox02's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
SeedSigner Full Review
Deep dive into SeedSigner's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison