BitBox02 vs SeedSigner — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison

An independent, data-driven comparison of BitBox02 and SeedSigner across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.

Quick Verdict

BitBox02 scores 5.9 vs SeedSigner's 5.4. BitBox02 leads in 5 of 8 categories.

BitBox02 is better suited for Privacy-focused users, Swiss quality seekers, Bitcoin-only users. SeedSigner is better suited for DIY enthusiasts, Cypherpunks, Security researchers.

5.9
Below AverageCustody Score
BitBox02
vs
5.4
Below AverageCustody Score
SeedSigner

Score Comparison

Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.

CriterionWeightBitBox02SeedSignerWinner
Security20%9.08.5BitBox02
Insurance15%1.01.0Tie
Regulatory15%2.01.0BitBox02
Fee Transparency10%9.510.0SeedSigner
Track Record15%7.06.0BitBox02
Withdrawal Flexibility10%9.58.5BitBox02
Reporting & Audit10%2.01.0BitBox02
Counterparty Diversification5%9.010.0SeedSigner
Overall Score100%
5.9
5.4
BitBox02

Score Radar

Visual overlay of BitBox02 and SeedSigner across all categories.

SecurityInsuranceRegulatoryFeesTrack RecordWithdrawalsReportingDiversification
BitBox02SeedSigner

Category-by-Category Analysis

A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.

Security (9.0 vs 8.5)

BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet key management with 100% in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Open-source audited. Incident history: No known compromises.

SeedSigner uses Stateless signing device key management with 100% (stateless) in cold storage and no confirmed penetration testing. Compliance: N/A. Incident history: No known compromises.

Insurance (1.0 vs 1.0)

BitBox02 offers None — self-custody hardware via N/A. Hardware wallet. Full user responsibility.

SeedSigner offers None — DIY self-custody via N/A. DIY project. No company behind it. No insurance possible.

Regulatory (2.0 vs 1.0)

BitBox02 holds N/A — hardware manufacturer and is not a qualified custodian operating in Switzerland. Shift Crypto AG — Swiss-registered company.

SeedSigner holds N/A — open-source project and is not a qualified custodian operating in Decentralized / Open Source. Community-driven open-source project. No company.

Fee Transparency (9.5 vs 10.0)

BitBox02 charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.

SeedSigner charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Build it yourself from off-the-shelf components. Truly zero trust.

Track Record (7.0 vs 6.0)

BitBox02 was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland. AUM: N/A (hardware manufacturer). Incident history: No known compromises.

SeedSigner was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Open Source. AUM: N/A (DIY project). Incident history: No known compromises.

Withdrawal Flexibility (9.5 vs 8.5)

BitBox02 withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$149 (Multi) / ~$129 (Bitcoin-only). Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 1,500+ (Multi edition).

SeedSigner withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$50 (components). Supported assets: Bitcoin only.

Reporting & Audit (2.0 vs 1.0)

BitBox02: SOC compliance is Open-source audited. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

SeedSigner: SOC compliance is N/A. Not classified as a qualified custodian.

Counterparty Diversification (9.0 vs 10.0)

BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: Dual-chip hardware wallet. Open-source. Swiss-made. Touch slider interface..

SeedSigner is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: DIY stateless signing device. Never stores keys. Camera-based QR code signing. Built from Raspberry Pi Zero..

Fee Comparison

Side-by-side fee breakdown for BitBox02 and SeedSigner.

Fee TypeBitBox02SeedSigner
Setup Fee$129-$149 (device purchase)~$50 (Raspberry Pi Zero + camera + screen)
Annual CustodyNoneNone
TransactionNetwork fees onlyNetwork fees only
WithdrawalNetwork fees onlyNetwork fees only

BitBox02: Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.

SeedSigner: Build it yourself from off-the-shelf components. Truly zero trust.

Feature Comparison

Checklist of features across both providers.

FeatureBitBox02SeedSigner
Bitcoin-only edition
Camera-based QR signing
DIY from off-the-shelf parts
Dice roll entropy
Dual-chip architecture
Fully open-source
MicroSD backup
Open-source firmware
Stateless — never stores keys
Tor support via BitBoxApp
Touch sliders
Zero supply chain trust required

Who Should Choose Which?

BitBox02 is better if you…

  • Are a privacy-focused users
  • Are a swiss quality seekers
  • Are a bitcoin-only users
  • Are a minimalists
  • Want: Swiss-made quality and security
  • Want: Dual-chip architecture
  • Want: Fully open-source

SeedSigner is better if you…

  • Are a diy enthusiasts
  • Are a cypherpunks
  • Are a security researchers
  • Are a ultra-paranoid bitcoiners
  • Want: Stateless — keys never stored on device
  • Want: Build from off-the-shelf components
  • Want: Zero supply chain attack surface

Frequently Asked Questions

Is BitBox02 or SeedSigner better for Bitcoin custody?

BitBox02 scores 5.9 vs 5.4 in our weighted Custody Score. BitBox02 leads in 5 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: BitBox02 is best for Privacy-focused users and Swiss quality seekers, while SeedSigner suits DIY enthusiasts and Cypherpunks.

What is the difference between BitBox02 and SeedSigner?

BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider, while SeedSigner is a cold storage / hardware provider. BitBox02 excels in Fee Transparency, whereas SeedSigner is strongest in Fee Transparency.

How do BitBox02 and SeedSigner fees compare?

BitBox02 charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees. SeedSigner charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees.

Which is more secure, BitBox02 or SeedSigner?

BitBox02 scores 9.0/10 for security while SeedSigner scores 8.5/10. BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet key management, and SeedSigner uses Stateless signing device.