Ledger vs BitBox02 — Head-to-Head Custody Comparison
An independent, data-driven comparison of Ledger and BitBox02 across security, insurance, fees, regulatory compliance, and more.
Verdict
Quick Verdict
Ledger scores 6.1 vs BitBox02's 5.9. Ledger leads in 1 of 8 categories.
Ledger is better suited for Individual holders, Long-term HODLers, Privacy-focused users. BitBox02 is better suited for Privacy-focused users, Swiss quality seekers, Bitcoin-only users.
Scores
Score Comparison
Weighted scores across all 8 custody criteria.
| Criterion | Weight | Ledger | BitBox02 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 20% | 9.0 | 9.0 | Tie |
| Insurance | 15% | 1.0 | 1.0 | Tie |
| Regulatory | 15% | 2.0 | 2.0 | Tie |
| Fee Transparency | 10% | 9.5 | 9.5 | Tie |
| Track Record | 15% | 8.5 | 7.0 | Ledger |
| Withdrawal Flexibility | 10% | 9.5 | 9.5 | Tie |
| Reporting & Audit | 10% | 2.0 | 2.0 | Tie |
| Counterparty Diversification | 5% | 9.0 | 9.0 | Tie |
| Overall Score | 100% | 6.1 | 5.9 | Ledger |
Visual
Score Radar
Visual overlay of Ledger and BitBox02 across all categories.
Deep Dive
Category-by-Category Analysis
A deeper look at how each provider performs in every scoring criterion.
Security (9.0 vs 9.0)
Ledger uses Secure element hardware wallet key management with 100% in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: ANSSI certified. Incident history: 2020 customer database leak (not keys). No key compromises..
BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet key management with 100% in cold storage and regular penetration testing. Compliance: Open-source audited. Incident history: No known compromises.
Insurance (1.0 vs 1.0)
Ledger offers None — self-custody hardware via N/A. Hardware wallet. Users are fully responsible for their own security and backup.
BitBox02 offers None — self-custody hardware via N/A. Hardware wallet. Full user responsibility.
Regulatory (2.0 vs 2.0)
Ledger holds N/A — hardware manufacturer and is not a qualified custodian operating in France (EU). Consumer electronics company. ANSSI certified secure element.
BitBox02 holds N/A — hardware manufacturer and is not a qualified custodian operating in Switzerland. Shift Crypto AG — Swiss-registered company.
Fee Transparency (9.5 vs 9.5)
Ledger charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. One-time device cost. No ongoing fees. Free Ledger Live software.
BitBox02 charges None in annual custody fees with Network fees only per transaction. Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.
Track Record (8.5 vs 7.0)
Ledger was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Paris, France. AUM: N/A (hardware manufacturer). Incident history: 2020 customer database leak (not keys). No key compromises..
BitBox02 was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland. AUM: N/A (hardware manufacturer). Incident history: No known compromises.
Withdrawal Flexibility (9.5 vs 9.5)
Ledger withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$79 (Nano S Plus) / ~$149 (Nano X). Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 5,500+ cryptocurrencies.
BitBox02 withdrawal fees: Network fees only. Minimum account: ~$149 (Multi) / ~$129 (Bitcoin-only). Supported assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, 1,500+ (Multi edition).
Reporting & Audit (2.0 vs 2.0)
Ledger: SOC compliance is ANSSI certified. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
BitBox02: SOC compliance is Open-source audited. Not classified as a qualified custodian.
Counterparty Diversification (9.0 vs 9.0)
Ledger is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: Hardware wallet with secure element chip. Keys never leave the device. Companion app Ledger Live for management..
BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider. Key management: Dual-chip hardware wallet. Open-source. Swiss-made. Touch slider interface..
Fees
Fee Comparison
Side-by-side fee breakdown for Ledger and BitBox02.
| Fee Type | Ledger | BitBox02 |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Fee | $79-$149 (device purchase) | $129-$149 (device purchase) |
| Annual Custody | None | None |
| Transaction | Network fees only | Network fees only |
| Withdrawal | Network fees only | Network fees only |
Ledger: One-time device cost. No ongoing fees. Free Ledger Live software.
BitBox02: Swiss quality. Bitcoin-only edition available for maximalists.
Features
Feature Comparison
Checklist of features across both providers.
| Feature | Ledger | BitBox02 |
|---|---|---|
| 5,500+ asset support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Bitcoin-only edition | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth (Nano X) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dual-chip architecture | ✗ | ✓ |
| Ledger Live management app | ✓ | ✗ |
| MicroSD backup | ✗ | ✓ |
| NFT management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open-source firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure element chip | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staking support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tor support via BitBoxApp | ✗ | ✓ |
| Touch sliders | ✗ | ✓ |
Recommendation
Who Should Choose Which?
Ledger is better if you…
- ✓Are a individual holders
- ✓Are a long-term hodlers
- ✓Are a privacy-focused users
- ✓Are a beginners to self-custody
- ✓Want: World's most popular hardware wallet
- ✓Want: Secure element chip — bank-grade security
- ✓Want: 5,500+ supported assets
BitBox02 is better if you…
- ✓Are a privacy-focused users
- ✓Are a swiss quality seekers
- ✓Are a bitcoin-only users
- ✓Are a minimalists
- ✓Want: Swiss-made quality and security
- ✓Want: Dual-chip architecture
- ✓Want: Fully open-source
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ledger or BitBox02 better for Bitcoin custody?
Ledger scores 6.1 vs 5.9 in our weighted Custody Score. Ledger leads in 1 of 8 scoring categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Ledger is best for Individual holders and Long-term HODLers, while BitBox02 suits Privacy-focused users and Swiss quality seekers.
What is the difference between Ledger and BitBox02?
Ledger is a cold storage / hardware provider, while BitBox02 is a cold storage / hardware provider. Ledger excels in Fee Transparency, whereas BitBox02 is strongest in Fee Transparency.
How do Ledger and BitBox02 fees compare?
Ledger charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees. BitBox02 charges None annual custody fees with Network fees only transaction fees.
Which is more secure, Ledger or BitBox02?
Ledger scores 9.0/10 for security while BitBox02 scores 9.0/10. Ledger uses Secure element hardware wallet key management, and BitBox02 uses Dual-chip hardware wallet.
Related
Explore More
Ledger Full Review
Deep dive into Ledger's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
BitBox02 Full Review
Deep dive into BitBox02's custody solution, scoring methodology, and detailed analysis.
Read review
Onramp vs BitGo
Compare Onramp (8.7) and BitGo (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Coinbase Custody
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Coinbase Custody (8.2) head-to-head.
View comparison
Onramp vs Fidelity Digital Assets
Compare Onramp (8.7) and Fidelity Digital Assets (8.4) head-to-head.
View comparison